ADVOCACY COALITION FRAMEWORK AND THE WICKED PROBLEM OF TRAFFIC CONGESTION IN NAIROBI CITY COUNTY KENYA
Keywords:
Advocacy Coalition, Wicked Problems, Media Advocacy, Traffic Congestion, SACCOs, Matatu Welfare AssociationAbstract
Purpose of Study: This study investigates the influence of the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) on the wicked problem of traffic congestion in Nairobi City County, Kenya. Specifically, it examines how media advocacy—a core ACF component—shapes policy responses to this complex, intractable urban transport challenge.
Methodology: Grounded in Complexity Theory and pragmatism, the study adopted a descriptive design. Data were collected from 168 transport sector stakeholders using simple random and stratified sampling. Semi-structured questionnaires and interview schedules achieved an 81.5% response rate (n=137). Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.
Findings: Media advocacy demonstrated a statistically significant strong positive correlation with addressing traffic congestion (r=0.736, p<0.01)—the highest among all ACF constructs. Regression analysis confirmed media advocacy as the most influential predictor (β=0.312, t=4.417, p<0.001). Descriptive results showed strong agreement that media advocacy creates stakeholder awareness (mean=4.21, highest), pushes county government into action (mean=4.18), prompts solutions via incident-driven coverage (mean=4.17), utilizes multiple media tools (mean=4.16), holds power accountable (mean=4.15), and disseminates timely information (mean=4.13). Congruent, intense, sustained coverage compels actionable policy measures on traffic management.
Conclusion: Media advocacy is the most influential ACF component in addressing traffic congestion in Nairobi County. It creates awareness, holds power accountable, disseminates information, and drives stakeholder mobilization. Strategic, sustained, multi-platform media engagement is the most potent tool for advocacy coalitions seeking durable transport policy reform in Nairobi.
References
Agyapong, F., & Ojo, T. K. (2018). Managing traffic congestion in the Accra central market, Ghana. Journal of Urban Management, 7(2), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2018.04.002
Berryman, C., Ferguson, C. J., & Negy, C. (2018). Social media use and mental health among young adults. Psychiatric quarterly, 89, 307-314. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29090428/
Cairney, P. (2021). The politics of policy analysis. Springer Nature. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-66122-9
Choge, I., Mwalimu, R., Mulyanga, S., Njiri, S., Kwachi, B., & Ontiri, S. (2023). Media advocacy in catalyzing actions by decision-makers: case study of the advance family planning initiative in Kenya. Frontiers in Global Women's Health, 4, 1168297. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2023.1168297
Firdausi, A. C., Manir, A. K., & Bappah, M. A. (2021). Advocating for the Formulation and Implementation of Social Media Policy for Information Service Delivery (ISD) in Nigerian Academic Libraries. International Journal of Applied Technologies in Library and Information Management, 7(3), 61-73. https://jatlim.org/volumes/Volume%207%20No%203/7%20Firdausi-1.pdf
Gabehart, K. M., & Weible, C. M. (2023). Advocacy coalition framework. In Encyclopedia of public policy (pp. 1-10). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978-3-030-90434-0_5-1
Gachanja, J. (2015). Mitigating Road Traic Congestion in the Nairobi Metropolitan Region. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3010692
Guo, C., & Saxton, G. D. (2020). The quest for attention: Nonprofit advocacy in a social media age. Stanford University Press. https://dokumen.pub/the-quest-for-attention-nonprofit-advocacy-in-a-social-media-age-9781503613089.html
Irwin, D., & Githinji, M. (2017). The influence of business associations on legislation: The case of Kenya. Journal of Public Affairs, 17(4), e1636. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1636
Jain, S., & Paul, S. (Eds.). (2020). Recent trends in image and signal processing in computer vision. Singapore: Springer. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339683718_Recent_Trends_in_Image_and_Signal_Processing_in_Computer_Vision
Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C. M., & Ingold, K. (2018). The advocacy coalition framework: An overview of the research program. Theories of the policy process, 135-171. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494284-5
Jha, A., & Chakarabarti, D. (2023). Media and public policy advocacy in India. ijpmonline, 2(2), 19-24. https://doi.org/10.26524/ijpm.2.11
Kono, T., & Joshi, K. K. (2019). Traffic congestion and land use regulations: Theory and policy analysis. Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/monograph/9780128170205/traffic-congestion-and-land-use-regulations
Markard, J., Suter, M., & Ingold, K. (2016). Socio-technical transitions and policy change–Advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 18, 215-237. https://scispace.com/pdf/socio-technical-transitions-and-policy-change-advocacy-3m899sihvl.pdf
Marohn Jr, C. L. (2021). Confessions of a recovering engineer: transportation for a strong town. John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.com/books/about/Confessions_of_a_Recovering_Engineer.html?id=niK9zAEACAAJ#:~:text=Perfect%20for%20anyone%20interested%20in,scenes%20of%20America's%20transportation%20systems.
Morgan, D. L. (2014). Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. Qualitative inquiry, 20(8), 1045-1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413513733
Mpogole, H., & Msangi, S. (2016). Traffic congestion in Dar es Salaam: Implications for workers’ productivity. Journal of Sustainable Development, 9(6), 103-110. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v9n6p103?urlappend=%3Futm_source%3Dresearchgate.net%26utm_medium%3Darticle
Mwangi, C. (2018). Media influence on public policy in Kenya: the case of illicit brew consumption. Sage open, 8(2), 2158244018764245. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018764245
Osei-Kojo, A., Ingold, K., & Weible, C. M. (2022). The advocacy coalition framework: lessons from applications in African countries. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 63(2), 181-201. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11615-022-00399-2
Peters, B., & Zittoun, P. (2012). Complexity and public policy: A new approach to 21st century politics, policy and society. Routledge. https://books.google.com/books/about/Complexity_and_Public_Policy.html?id=uIBYAAAAYAAJ
Ritchey, T. (2013). Wicked problems. Acta morphologica generalis, 2(1). https://www.swemorph.com/pdf/amg-2-1-2013.pdf
Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding descriptive research designs and methods. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(1), 8-12. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31789957/
Sitati, C. N., Oludhe, C., Oyake, L., & Mbandi, A. M. (2022). A street-level assessment of greenhouse gas emissions associated with traffic congestion in the city of Nairobi, Kenya. Clean Air Journal, 32(1), 1-12. https://scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2410-972X2022000100006
Vijayalakshmi, S., & Raj, K. (2023). Economic and Environmental Cost of Traffic Congestion in India. Taylor & Francis. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781032662299/economic-environmental-cost-traffic-congestion-india-vijayalakshmi-krishna-raj
Walls, H. L. (2018). Wicked problems and a ‘wicked’ solution. Globalization and health, 14, 1-3. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12992-018-0353-x
Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (2017). A guide to the advocacy coalition framework. In Handbook of public policy analysis (pp. 149-162). Routledge. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Christopher-Weible/publication/286358383_A_Guide_to_the_Advocacy_Coalition_Framework/links/5bd0801092851cabf2646c3d/A-Guide-to-the-Advocacy-Coalition-Framework.pdf
Zatoński, M. Z., Egbe, C. O., Robertson, L., & Gilmore, A. (2023). Framing the policy debate over tobacco control legislation and tobacco taxation in South Africa. Tobacco control, 32(4), 450-457. https://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/tobaccocontrol/32/4/450.full.pdf
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 STANELY ONTIRI MOTIERI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are properly credited.
