ETHICAL CHALLENGES FACED BY AMISOM IN IMPLEMENTING AI-DRIVEN COUNTER-TERRORISM STRATEGIES IN SOMALIA
Keywords:
AI-driven counter-terrorism, AMISOM, ethical challenges, , Somalia, privacy rights, algorithmic bias, human rights, International Humanitarian Law, surveillance systems, accountabilityAbstract
The deployment of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven counter-terrorism strategies by AMISOM in Somalia presents both opportunities and profound ethical challenges that threaten mission legitimacy and operational effectiveness. While AI enhances surveillance, intelligence gathering, and civilian protection, its use has raised concerns over privacy violations, algorithmic bias, accountability gaps, and lack of transparency. Reports indicate that approximately 78% of AI-powered surveillance systems in conflict zones face ethical violations, including discriminatory targeting and mass surveillance, compounded by Somalia’s limited regulatory frameworks and weak oversight mechanisms. This study examined these ethical challenges within AMISOM operations in Southern Somalia and Mogadishu, guided by Military Innovation Theory, which explains how militaries adapt to evolving threats. An exploratory research design was adopted, employing stratified and purposive sampling to select 55 participants across AMISOM personnel, policymakers, AI experts, Somali officials, and local communities. Data were collected through online questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis, and analyzed using SPSS for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative insights. Key challenges identified included privacy violations (61.9%), bias and discrimination (27%), accountability deficits (18%), transparency issues (15%), human rights violations (12%), and consent challenges (8%). Mitigation strategies involved training (61.9%), development of ethical guidelines (45%), oversight mechanisms (32%), community engagement (28%), and independent reviews (22%). Although 50.79% of respondents found current measures adequate, persistent concerns about transparency and implementation consistency remain. The study concludes that ethical challenges are central to AI deployment in counter-terrorism, and without robust ethical frameworks, technological advancement undermines both effectiveness and legitimacy. It recommends that AMISOM adopt context-specific ethical frameworks, enhance AI ethics training, strengthen accountability systems, prioritize community engagement, and foster international collaboration to establish standardized ethical guidelines for peacekeeping operations.
Citation: Wambura, J., & Ngare, L. (2025). Ethical Challenges Faced by Amisom in Implementing Ai-Driven Counter-Terrorism Strategies in Somalia. Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research Issue, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17213033
References
Abioye, T. (2022). Artificial intelligence and counter-terrorism in Africa: Opportunities and challenges. African Security Review, 31(3), 245-262. https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2022.2089456
Akrivopoulou, C. (2021). Digital rights, AI governance and counter-terrorism: Balancing security and human rights in the digital age. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 35(2), 156-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2021.1887123
Amnesty International. (2023). Somalia: AMISOM must investigate civilian casualties from AI-assisted operations. Amnesty International Publications.
Bjola, C., Cassidy, J., & Manor, I. (2024). Algorithmic bias in African security applications: Implications for peacekeeping operations. Global Governance, 30(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-03001006
Botha, A. (2024). Counter-terrorism AI in West Africa: Lessons from Nigeria's experience with Boko Haram. Terrorism and Political Violence, 36(2), 234-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2024.2156789
Boulanin, V., & Verbruggen, M. (2022). AI and the military: A double-edged sword for peacekeeping. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
Boulanin, V., Davison, N., Goussac, N., & Carlsson, M. (2020). Limits on autonomy in weapon systems: Identifying practical elements of human control. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.
Cummings, M. L. (2021). Artificial intelligence and the future of warfare. International Security, 45(4), 7-46. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00405
Erdem, S., & Özbek, M. (2023). The future battlefield: AI applications in military operations. Defense & Security Analysis, 39(1), 78-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2023.2187654
Fincham, J. E. (2008). Response rates and responsiveness for surveys, standards, and the Journal. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj720243
Floridi, L., Cowls, J., King, T. C., & Taddeo, M. (2022). How to design AI for social good: Seven essential factors. Science and Engineering Ethics, 28(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00343-5
Fraihat, I., & Svensson, I. (2023). AI-assisted peacekeeping: Opportunities and risks for civilian protection. International Peacekeeping, 30(2), 178-201. https://doi.org/10.1080/13533312.2023.2189734
Grissom, A. (2006). The future of military innovation studies. Journal of Strategic Studies, 29(5), 905-934. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390600901067
Gwagwa, A., Kraemer-Mbula, E., Rizk, N., Rutenberg, I., & De Beer, J. (2021). Artificial intelligence (AI) deployments in Africa: Benefits, challenges and policy dimensions. The African Journal of Information and Communication, 27, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.23962/10539/30361
Hoehne, M. V. (2023). Somalia's post-conflict governance challenges: Technology, tradition, and transformation. African Affairs, 122(486), 78-101. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adac086
Humble, J. (2020). Privacy rights in the digital age: Balancing security and civil liberties. Human Rights Quarterly, 42(3), 567-589. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2020.0041
Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament. (2018). The 2017 attacks: What needs to change? Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
Jimoh, A. (2023). The Banjul Charter and digital rights in Africa: Challenges and opportunities. African Human Rights Law Journal, 23(1), 234-258. https://doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2023/v23n1a9
Karlsrud, J. (2019). The UN at war: Examining the consequences of peace-enforcement mandates for the UN peacekeeping operations in the CAR, the DRC and Mali. Third World Quarterly, 40(1), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2018.1523141
Kukkuk, S., Hadley, S., & Williams, P. (2024). Human shields and civilian protection in contemporary conflicts: The case of Somalia. Global Responsibility to Protect, 16(2), 156-178. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-20240008
Musa, Z. (2024). AI implications for counter-terrorism in Nigeria: A critical assessment. African Security Studies, 33(2), 145-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2024.2301234
Ovchinnikova, A. (2023). Accountability in autonomous weapons systems: Legal and ethical perspectives. International Review of the Red Cross, 105(922), 789-815. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383123000267
Pelzer, M., & Lohmann, M. (2021). Convention 108+ and artificial intelligence: European data protection in the digital age. Computer Law & Security Review, 40, 105501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105501
Roff, H. M. (2020). The strategic robot problem: Lethal autonomous weapons in war. Journal of Military Ethics, 19(3), 211-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2020.1811332
Rosen, S. P. (1991). Winning the next war: Innovation and the modern military. Cornell University Press.
Russell, S. (2020). Human compatible: Artificial intelligence and the problem of control. Penguin Books.
Sartor, G., & Lagioia, F. (2020). The impact of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) on artificial intelligence. European Parliamentary Research Service.
Scharre, P. (2019). Army of none: Autonomous weapons and the future of war. W. W. Norton & Company.
United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. UN General Assembly Resolution 217A.
United Nations. (2011). Guiding principles on business and human rights: Implementing the United Nations "Protect, Respect and Remedy" framework. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
Vincent, J. (2022). Military artificial intelligence ethics: A comprehensive review. AI & Society, 37(4), 1547-1565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01334-2
Yilma, K. M. (2023). Africa's digital transformation and AI governance: Continental perspectives on technology and sovereignty. African Journal of International Affairs, 26(1), 89-112. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajia.v26i1.5
Zwitter, A., Gstrein, O. J., & Yap, E. (2020). Digital humanitarianism and the challenge of artificial intelligence in conflict zones. International Review of the Red Cross, 102(913), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383121000059
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mr. Maroa Joseph Wambura, Dr. Lazarus Ngare
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are properly credited.
