Peer Review Process

The International Journal for Disaster Management and Risk Reduction (IJDMRR) follows a rigorous peer review process to ensure the quality, integrity, and relevance of all published research. The steps are as follows:
-
Manuscript Submission
-
Researchers submit their articles for consideration.
-
-
Initial Editorial Assessment
-
The journal editor conducts a preliminary review to determine whether the article fits within the journal’s scope and meets basic quality standards.
-
-
Reviewer Selection
-
If the article passes the initial assessment, the editor selects peer reviewers who are experts in the relevant field.
-
Reviewers are usually anonymous, and the author may not know their identities.
-
-
Peer Review Evaluation
-
Reviewers evaluate the article based on:
-
Research quality and originality
-
Methodology and data analysis
-
Potential bias
-
Ethical considerations
-
Clarity and coherence
-
-
Reviewers provide detailed feedback and recommend whether the article should be:
-
Accepted
-
Accepted with minor revisions
-
Rejected with major revisions
-
Rejected outright
-
-
-
Editorial Decision
-
The editor makes the final decision based on reviewers’ recommendations.
-
If revisions are requested, the author resubmits the manuscript after addressing reviewer comments. This process may repeat for several rounds until the article meets the required standards.
-
-
Publication
-
Accepted articles are published either in open access (freely available online) or subscription-based journals (accessible to subscribers, usually academic institutions).
-
-
Post-Publication Review
-
The peer review process may continue after publication.
-
Editors and authors can issue corrections or retract articles if significant concerns arise.
-